Now like a journal or diary, only without the sincerity.

Showing posts with label baseball. Show all posts
Showing posts with label baseball. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 18, 2007

AMI

I know I'm not posting much this summer, but I can not let this pass unnoticed.

The American Mustache Institute's "Best Sports Mustache of All Time" contest. I feel as if we have tread this ground before, but I can't find the more substantial posts on the subject of baseball and mustaches, and certainly the AMI didn't steal the idea from us. It must just be part of the zeitgeist (as it should be).

Read More...

Monday, June 4, 2007

To Me, This is Too Much

I like a good managerial rant now and then, and do think that sometimes (oftentimes, in fact), umpires take themselves far too seriously and purposely escalate disputes to exercise a bit of otherwise atrophied authority. Calling balls, strikes, and outs can get tedious, I guess, and as an ump, no one ever really enjoys your work. You're either unnoticed or thoroughly excoriated. Still, it's what you signed up for. On the other hand, this is far too much. It's mildly amusing before it gets plain stupid. Come on, Mississippi Braves manager Phil Wellman, you're a grown man. A double-A manager in Mississippi, yes, but still: a grown man. Act like one. Here's the tape:



Also, a question: are all the Braves minor league affiliates called the Braves?

Read More...

Thursday, May 17, 2007

Important Derek Bell News

Operation Shutdown is over, people. And it's ending with a team called Oil Can Boyd's Traveling All-Stars. Derek Bell returns May 18th in a game against the always tough New Haven County Cutters. The All-Stars are touring to celebrate Negro League heritage and the tradition of barnstorming, which is a great way to remember the past. They're also doing it with Derek Bell, which is an even better--though far less noble--way to remember the past. And if you can think of a better nostalgic name for barnstorming team filled with late '80s-early '90s ballplayers Oil Can Boyd kind of knows, you tell me. Because I can't. Pat of WHYGAVS and the AOL Fanhouse (is that supposed to sound like "funhouse" except sportsier?) provides the details.

According to his Wikipedia page, Derek Bell offered his famous "Operation Shutdown" ultimatum to the Pittsburgh Pirates on March 18th, 2002 after the Pirates informed him that his .173 average in 2001 coupled with his poor play that spring was likely to cost him his job. Bell left the team on March 29th and sailed away on his houseboat. If May 18th is the first game for Oil Can's All-Stars (believe it or not, it's hard to gather information on them), that will mean Operation Shutdown lasted five years, one month, and 19 days. Honestly? I can't believe someone wanted him this soon.

NB: It does look like the All-Stars are playing today in Nashua, NH against the Nashua Pride. So, five years, one month, and 18 days.

UPDATE: Make it 17 days. Oil Can took the hill LAST NIGHT against his former team, the Brockton (Mass.) Rox. I presume DB cracked (get it? crack-ed!) the lineup last night, ending the Operation.

Read More...

Friday, April 27, 2007

Steroids + Sportswriters = BS

I like Michael Lewis, the author of Moneyball, but I think his suggestion that sabermetrics will account for steroids is ridiculous. I am also a firm believer in the value of sabermetrics, to the point that a snarky sabermetric-based blog is one of my favorite and most frequently visited sites (even if it is certainly not the most frequently updated of those sites). And I do think that steroids have negatively affected baseball, most visibly everything under the bill of Barry Bonds's now comically oversized batting helmet. But, as I always do when people ask me about steroids, I will point out a few things:

  • First, technically speaking, steroids were not illegal in baseball when most of the accused were allegedly taking them. Sure, they were illegal in the U.S., but so is adultery in most states, and we're sure not holding dudes out of the Hall of Fame for that. (Wade Boggs, I'm looking in your direction.)
  • Second, just taking steroids doesn't make you good. It does help, admittedly. But it does not make you good. (Felix Heredia, I'm looking in your direction.

We can debate the effect of steroids all we want, and you can likely convince me that there is a tangible and unfair benefit to using them (for baseball, not for adultery). But it's Lewis's claim (which was likely just made off-the-cuff, but which was printed in The Paper of Record anyway) that we (that is, the baseball community, of which I am ever-so-tangentially a part) will have access to a statistically meaningful number of steroid-users' statistically meaningful abuse histories. Here's Lewis:

But I do believe that eventually we’re going to know a lot of people who did them. And it is going to be really interesting when those names and dates become available, what’s done with it to try to factor in steroids into the record books.

Factor it into the record books? Like, applying a steroids coefficient to the years of 1989-2003 for confirmed steroid users? Will we need a separate number for HGH?

The author's article Rob Mackey continues:

As Lewis points out, it has become common to register the exact number of feet a home run travels, so it may soon be possible for statistics gurus to come up with a reasonable number of feet to subtract from homers hit by players proven or suspected of juicing.

Meaningless. Do we count it as a home run if it wouldn't have gone over the fence but would have traveled far enough to bounce off Jose Canseco's head? It just may NOT soon be possible for statistics gurus "to come up with a reasonable number of feet to subtract from homers hit by players proven or suspected of juicing." What if the guy took steroids, but didn't work out enough to get Bonds huge. What if he only did leg presses? Is there a relative effect? A new number of feet for guys who took the cream versus guys who took the clear? What about Gary Sheffield before and after Barry Bonds stole his personal chef?

Mackey's elaboration on the proposed "steroid coefficient" (my coinage, or at least a coinage I did not consciously steal) gets even more outrageous when he brings the new math to the old school:

And, of course, once we have a number to divide by, there’s nothing to stop us from multiplying with it too, to estimate how many home runs players from earlier eras might have hit au jus. As Lewis says, “Babe Ruth might say, if he were looking at the game now, ‘Boy, think how many home runs I could’ve hit if I could’ve done those steroids,’ which he probably would’ve done.”

I can go on and on about how stupid Mackey sounds here, even though it's really just a jesting little article. I'll just say: Thankfully, it's not Lewis implying that we should take all the F9s on Ruth's scoresheets, determine how many feet they probably flew before being caught using the "Ford Model T Tale of the Tape"TM, and then apply the coefficient to give the Babe an extra 100 dingers. But it is Lewis implying that Ruth would have juiced. I contend Ruth wouldn't have juiced, because as I indirectly pointed out above, you need to work out to get the benefit of 'roids, and the Bambino does not strike me as Gold's Gym kind of guy. But what am I? Just an lapsed baseball historian, I guess.

Read More...

Monday, April 23, 2007

Before there were Rec Specs

and before Chris Sabo and Horace Grant made wearing them cool for about 17 seconds, there were all these guys, Tom Henke's Army. That linked entry from Joe Sports Fan represents just about everything I stand for, athletically, intellectually, nostalgically, culturally, politically, romantically, religiously. Everything.

Here is Leon "The Bull" Durham:


Everything.

Read More...

Wednesday, April 18, 2007

ESPN discovers the ellipsis

"I do at times, but it's a timely thing," Manuel said, according to the Philadelphia Inquirer. "We're still hustling. We're still playing hard. We might be trying to do too much. For me to go in there and stand up and throw a fit, I can go in there and tear the whole ... locker room up. I could come here and throw every ... chair in here out. What the hell? I don't see how that's going to do me any good."

From an article about Phillie's manager Charlie Manuel's fervent desire to get all UFC on sports radio guy Howard Eskin. Typically, ESPN (and other journalistic enterprises) choose to avoid publishing expletives by replacing them in quotes with "[expletive]" or some variant. I wish they would follow comic strip convention ("&*@#!"), but it seems they've moved on to simply using an ellipsis to open up our imaginations, and also perhaps to leave open the possibility that Charlie Manuel, in a fit of rage, chose to insert a long and distracting subordinate clause rather than a selection from the trucker patois. Let's fill in these ellipses.

What ESPN quotes Charlie Manuel as saying: "I can go in there and tear the whole ... locker room up."

What Charlie Manuel actually said: "I can go in there and tear the whole--and by whole I mean, entire--and really, we're blessed with a really large locker room and meeting space, so for me to tear this place apart would not only show a real disrespect for the architects, designers, front office, and our great support staff of janitors and equipment guys, it would really exhaust a guy my age, and while I do work out, I'm really in no shape to rip and entire locker room up."

What ESPN quotes Charlie Manuel as saying: "I could come here and throw every ... chair in here out."

What Charlie Manuel actually said: "I could come here and throw every, single solitary piece of furniture, much of which is quite comfortable (not to mention heavy, like I said, I'm not in great shape) and really wouldn't fit out in the hall, so I could throw a chair or two but I wouldn't throw every chair in here out."

And then there's lots more blither-blather about Charlie Manuel and Howard Erskin's mutual professional distaste for one another, and some commentary on the Phillies slow start, and no mention of the particular game (Phillies lost 8-1, remember? Didn't think so) until this:

As for the the team's famously caustic fans? They mounted an "E-A-G-L-E-S, Eagles!" chant in the seventh inning, choosing to praise the city's successful NFL team rather than bury its baseball team.

Good to know that whoever is writing for ESPN took 10th grade English and read at least the most famous part of Julius Caesar, even if the allusion is a little muddied here.

Read More...

Tuesday, April 10, 2007

Important Gary Gaetti News


For those who might care, or merely be amused, I'd like to share that I have just discovered that Gary "The Rat" Gaetti is the new hitting coach of the Durham Bulls.

No current information available on Kent Hrbek.

Read More...

Thursday, April 5, 2007

"Ridiculously Blatant"

Via Deadspin, a new favorite website (and probably a book worth a look, as they say... somewhere), with images and analysis of "ridiculously blatant" cheating by Major League Baseball players. I love cheaters, especially multi-millionaire cheaters who are preternaturally talented at the thing they're cheating at. I wish someone would start a site devoted to tracking cheating in the high-stakes world of classical music performance, because I just know that weasel Yo Yo Ma has been doctoring his bows for years.

In sum: beautiful work, K-Rod and Mr. Zumsteg, and I recommend that Salomon Torres (3 Saves and counting! (This has been a "Stat that Matters"TM)) does a little homework with this game film.

UPDATE: K-Rod denies he cheats. Predictable. Also predictable is the fact that Yo Yo Ma continues his steadfast silence in the face of my charges against him. I take his silence as a tacit confession.

Read More...